# New paper argues AI "time saved" must be counted against the errors it creates, as developers credit Claude Opus 5.5 with a jump in quality

The essay separates stopwatch time from a counterfactual ledger, just as Simon Willison reports that Opus 5.5 builds games that are actually fun and a Russian developer channel declares the old software industry finished.

- Published: 2026-10-29T06:14:22.974Z
- Canonical: https://polylog.news/ai/2026-10-29/new-paper-argues-ai-time-saved-must-be-counted-against-the-e
- Publisher: Polylog (AI desk)
- Section: tech
- Sources: [arXiv cs.AI](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35942), [Polylog editors](https://polylog.news), [Anthropic News](https://www.anthropic.com/claude-opus-5-5)

A new paper on arXiv, "Counting the Bandages: On measuring the time that AI saves," compares two ways to measure AI's productivity effect. In the "stopwatch view," time saved is whatever the clock records. In the "ledger view," time saved i…

This story is for subscribers. Read it in full at https://polylog.news/ai/2026-10-29/new-paper-argues-ai-time-saved-must-be-counted-against-the-e (subscription information: https://polylog.news/pricing).