Morning Edition · Thursday, July 23, 2026Published at 1:28 AM EDT · New York

Revised CLARITY Act Would Bar the President and Officials From Issuing Crypto Until 2029

Seven pro-crypto Senate Democrats said the new Republican draft still does not go far enough on ethics and illicit-finance safeguards, and prediction-market odds of passage fell to 38%.

Save

Revised CLARITY Act Would Bar the President and Officials From Issuing Crypto Until 2029

Senate Republicans on July 22 released a revised draft of the market-structure bill known as the CLARITY Act, adding a conflict-of-interest section that would prohibit the president, vice president, members of Congress, federal judges and their spouses from issuing or sponsoring digital assets for compensation while in office, CoinDesk reported.

The restriction is temporary. The provision carries a sunset clause stating it has no force after noon on January 20, 2029, the end of the current presidential term, and it would still allow officials to invest in crypto and does not extend to their children, according to CryptoSlate. Enforcement would fall to the Justice Department, a point Democratic negotiators have criticized as unreliable.

The ethics section is directed at the crypto ventures tied to President Donald Trump, and it has become the central obstacle to passage. Seven pro-crypto Senate Democrats said the draft still falls short on ethics, consumer protection and illicit-finance provisions, while adding that they remain committed to working with Republicans to advance the bill. Senator Cynthia Lummis, a lead negotiator, said further discussion on the ethics language was expected.

Traders lowered the estimated odds of near-term passage. The prediction-market probability of the Clarity Act becoming law fell to 38%, one factor cited, alongside higher oil prices and interest rates, in a broad decline in crypto prices.

Veracity: Corroborated

86/100

If true, who benefits: Democratic negotiators and ethics-reform advocates, who use the framing that the clause is toothless to extract stronger terms, while delay itself benefits incumbents that prefer case-by-case enforcement over a settled commodity-versus-security line.
The nuance: The "bars the president" headline omits that the provision is a draft with roughly 38% passage odds, sunsets at noon on January 20, 2029, still permits officials to invest, exempts their children, and rests on contested Justice Department rather than state-level enforcement.

An open-source-intelligence read of how likely this story is true with its real nuance, not a judgment of any outlet. It assesses the claim, weighing independent and adversarial reporting. How we label confidence.

What this means

The bill would set the framework for which tokens are commodities versus securities, so its delay keeps the largest question in US crypto policy unresolved and leaves exchanges, issuers and institutional allocators operating under case-by-case enforcement. The fight over the ethics clause shows the limit of the industry's political spending. Crypto money helped elect a friendly Congress, but a self-limiting ethics rule aimed at the president is now a condition of the Democratic votes needed to pass.

What to watch

Whether the sunset date and DOJ-enforcement design survive negotiation, since a rule that expires in 2029 and relies on the executive branch to enforce itself is weaker than a permanent statute.
Whether enough Senate Democrats flip to yes, the decisive variable for whether the bill reaches a floor vote this session.

Observations to monitor, not financial advice.

3 sources

Synthesized from: CoinDesk · CryptoSlate · Polylog editors

Part of a tracked trend

Crypto Political Spending Converts Into US Policy Wins

Over ~3-9 months, crypto-industry political money translates into concrete US policy outcomes — election wins and statutory moves like a federal CBDC ban — entrenching a regulatory environment favorable to the industry.