Morning Edition · Friday, August 21, 2026Published at 1:52 AM EDT · New York
Mike Selig told the agency's new Innovation Advisory Committee it will use existing authorities, and Coinbase's Brian Armstrong put a date on it: a Senate vote on September 15 or agency rules the day after.

Mike Selig, chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), told the first meeting of the agency's Innovation Advisory Committee that the CFTC will not wait for Congress. In remarks circulated by Cointelegraph, Selig said that if the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act) "continues to stall because of Democrats obstruction, the CFTC will utilize its existing authorities to begin establishing a regime for crypto asset markets."
Brian Armstrong, chief executive of Coinbase, put a specific date on the same expectation, saying regulatory clarity arrives either through a Senate bill clearing 60 votes on September 15 or new CFTC and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules the following day. President Trump met digital-asset executives this week and pressed the Senate to pass the bill.
The obstacle is not primarily technical. A Reuters/Ipsos poll found that 63 percent of Americans consider the Trump family's crypto profits inappropriate, with responses splitting sharply along party lines. Democratic senators have used the conflict-of-interest question to delay floor votes, and the substance of market-structure legislation keeps getting displaced by the ethics dispute rather than debated on its merits.
Rules written by an agency and rules written into statute are not equivalent goods. A statute binds successor administrations and survives litigation more reliably. An agency regime built on existing authorities can be rewritten by the next chairman, narrowed by a court, or contested on the grounds that Congress never granted the power being claimed. Firms that build compliance around agency guidance take on a durability risk that a statute would have removed.
Large CFTC-registered venues and exchanges with legal budgets gain either way, and Democratic senators gain from keeping the ethics question attached to the bill, with the president's family businesses the material stake behind that dispute.
Part of a tracked trend
Crypto Market-Structure Bill Stalls in the Senate
Ethics disputes over the president's personal crypto ventures keep displacing the substance of United States market-structure legislation, leaving digital-asset rules dependent on agency discretion rather than statute.
Start a discussion in Townsquare.
More from this edition
Selig's phrase "Democrats obstruction" is his own characterization of why the bill stalled and multiple outlets report it as a quotation, not a finding, and Brian Armstrong's September 15 date is a prediction rather than a scheduled Senate vote.
An open-source-intelligence read of how likely this story is true with its real nuance, not a judgment of any outlet. It assesses the claim, weighing independent and adversarial reporting. How we label confidence.
What this means
If the Senate does not act, United States digital-asset market structure will rest on agency discretion rather than law, and the exposed parties are exchanges, brokers and custodians that must commit capital to compliance systems whose legal basis can change with an election or a court ruling. Firms with existing CFTC registrations and legal budgets absorb that uncertainty more easily than smaller venues, which pushes consolidation toward incumbents. The two outcomes are concrete: a bill passes with bipartisan votes and rules become durable, or the CFTC proceeds alone and every rule it writes carries litigation risk from the first day.
What to watch
Observations to monitor, not financial advice.
Synthesized from: CoinDesk · Polylog editors · Bitcoin Magazine · crypto.news
Comments
0No comments yet.