Morning Edition · Saturday, October 10, 2026Published at 1:48 AM EDT · New York
Researcher Cayden Liao and Veria AI reported the flaw on Sept. 22, RippleX shipped a fix on Sept. 25, and the demonstrated attack used the Batch transaction type that went live on mainnet on Oct. 9.

Developers of the XRP Ledger have disclosed and fixed a flaw that dates to 2015. The flaw could have let an attacker create spendable XRP without funding it, which would break the asset's fixed supply of 100 billion tokens. Researchers showed that a single payment could produce XRP the sender never held. The disclosure led to an emergency software release.
The demonstrated attack used three accounts. The attacker funded two of them and left the third unfunded. The attacker then built a batch transaction with three parts: a payment that creates the unfunded account, a simple transaction from that new account, and a payment from the victim account to the attacker. The researcher Cayden Liao and the security firm Veria AI reported the bug internally on Sept. 22. RippleX, Ripple's engineering arm, said it found no evidence that anyone used the flaw on public networks. It shipped the fix in xrpld version 3.4.1 on Sept. 25. The trading-news channel BWE News carried the disclosure to Chinese-language readers within minutes.
The timing matters because the Batch feature itself just went live. Batch activated on mainnet with support from 30 validators, according to crypto.news. It lets users bundle between two and eight transactions into one operation. This is the second serious finding tied to Batch this year. In February, an automated AI security tool found a signature-validation flaw in the Batch amendment. That flaw would have let an attacker run inner transactions for any account without its private key. Ripple responded with rippled 3.1.1, which marked Batch as unsupported before it could activate.
Neither bug cost anyone money. But both show the same pattern. A new feature that combines several operations atomically creates code paths that older rules about balances and account creation were never written to handle.
What this means
When a ledger's supply is broken, every holder is diluted at once, and the issued assets on the ledger that settle against XRP are exposed as well. Undetected minting is the most serious failure a base layer can experience. Bitcoin's 2010 value-overflow bug briefly created about 184 billion coins before a soft fork reversed it. Its 2018 inflation bug in Bitcoin Core was fixed before anyone used it. The new information here is that the XRP Ledger's two Batch-related findings were both made with automated or AI-assisted review, and both came before or around activation. The desk's read is that more disclosures of this kind will follow on the XRP Ledger and comparable chains over the coming months. Reviewers are now pointing these tools at new features layered on decade-old code. The disclosures will probably arrive after fixes have shipped, so the direct cost to holders stays near zero while upgrade schedules slow. That read is wrong if anyone finds evidence of exploitation on mainnet, or if a material share of validators keeps running unpatched software after Batch activation.
Part of a tracked trend
Unaudited Open-Source Crypto Code Surfaces at Scale
Coordinated volunteer and AI-assisted review keeps exposing large backlogs of undiscovered defects in the open-source libraries that wallets, nodes and protocols depend on, so disclosure waves — not novel attacker research — become a recurring driver of emergency patches and incident risk across the ecosystem.
Start a discussion in Townsquare.
More from this edition
What to watch
Observations to monitor, not financial advice.
Synthesized from: CoinDesk · Polylog editors · crypto.news · XRP Ledger blog
Comments
0No comments yet.