Morning Edition · Wednesday, September 30, 2026Published at 2:34 AM EDT · New York
The model is priced at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, with a 1.05 million token context window, the same headline rate Anthropic set for Claude Sonnet 5.5 one day earlier.
OpenAI used its DevDay keynote on Monday to reprice the middle of its model lineup. GPT-6.1 Sol is positioned as offering near-Astra intelligence for agentic coding, computer use and professional work, at one-fifth of GPT-6 Astra's standard input and output token prices. The published rates are $2 per million input tokens, $0.10 per million cached input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, with a 1,050,000-token context window and a maximum output of 128,000 tokens. The cached-input rate is half what GPT-6 Sol charged a week earlier.
The more important comparison is external. Anthropic released Claude Sonnet 5.5 the day before at the same $2 and $10 per million tokens, so the two most heavily used mid-tier coding models now carry identical list prices. VentureBeat also reports an ultrafast serving tier running at about 300 tokens per second, which is likely where competition will shift once the two vendors' prices converge.
"Near-Astra" is OpenAI's own characterization of the model. The company has not published a third-party replication, and independent reference points, such as agentic-coding and computer-use test suites run by outside evaluators, will take days to appear. The model is available now for Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise and Edu users in ChatGPT Work and Codex, and in the API as gpt-6.1-sol, alongside more than twenty other DevDay announcements. OpenAI told the audience that ChatGPT now reaches 1.2 billion weekly users, a distribution base large enough that a list-price cut directly reduces gross margin rather than functioning mainly as a marketing move.
OpenAI, which converts a distribution advantage into volume at a price that pressures Anthropic's Sonnet tier and every inference reseller whose margin assumed a stable price floor.
Part of a tracked trend
Frontier Model Price War
Frontier API vendors increasingly compete on strategic price-cutting rather than pure capability, repeatedly launching or repricing models below prevailing rates to grab share and compressing industry inference margins; expect recurring below-rival pricing moves.
Start a discussion in Townsquare.
More from this edition
The published rates, context window and cached-input discount are independently documented, but "near-Astra intelligence" remains OpenAI's own benchmark characterization, and the 1.2 billion weekly users figure is self-reported with no audited definition of a weekly user.
An open-source-intelligence read of how likely this story is true with its real nuance, not a judgment of any outlet. It assesses the claim, weighing independent and adversarial reporting. How we label confidence.
What this means
The mechanism is substitution among models of similar capability. When a vendor sells most of the frontier's usefulness at one-fifth of the price, the first buyers to move are high-volume agentic workloads, where token volume rather than peak reasoning ability determines the bill. Exposed are Anthropic's Sonnet tier, which now competes at the same list price without OpenAI's consumer distribution advantage, and every inference provider whose margin assumed a stable price floor. The precedent is the 2024-2026 pattern in which each cheap-tier launch was answered within weeks by a rival's repricing rather than by a new capability. The likelier outcome is another below-rival price cut or cache-discount move from a major API vendor within weeks, with Google and Meta the most probable movers given their own serving-cost advantages. This would be proved wrong if independent agentic-coding evaluations show Sol performing materially below Astra on real tasks, in which case the price cut would represent a downgrade in tier rather than a price war.
What to watch
Observations to monitor, not financial advice.
Synthesized from: OpenAI News · OpenAI DevDay 2026 Recap · Polylog editors
Comments
0No comments yet.