Morning Edition · Wednesday, August 12, 2026Published at 1:04 AM EDT · New York
The attacker minted unbacked XRP on another blockchain and swapped it for real tokens held in reserve, in a week when the digital asset is trading about 49 percent below its October 2025 high.

An attacker drained about $200,000 from a bridge connecting the XRP Ledger to another blockchain by creating unbacked tokens and exchanging them for real XRP held in reserve, CoinDesk reported. The bridge software accepted deposits it had not verified. The operator has halted the bridge and filed a complaint with the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
The loss is small by the standards of past bridge failures, and the mechanism is familiar. Software that issues a claim on assets it does not hold produces the same result in digital form that it produces in banking, which is a run once holders discover the claim is not backed.
Prices have moved gradually rather than dropping sharply. Bitcoin traded around $64,000 after slipping below $65,000, CoinDesk reported on Monday, noting that the corporate holder Strategy sold 1,690 bitcoin in August at an average price near $64,262. GNcrypto reported that the asset is about 49 percent below its October 2025 peak above $126,000.
The contrast with gold illustrates the difference between the two assets. Gold rose this week on expectations of higher inflation, while bitcoin's price moved with the volatility typical of a leveraged bet on interest-rate expectations, falling when jobs data reduced the likelihood of Federal Reserve rate cuts.
What this means
Bitcoin is currently priced according to the expected path of dollar liquidity, not according to the demand for a hedge against currency risk that is lifting gold, and that difference determines who bears the losses. Leveraged holders and corporate treasuries that bought at higher prices absorb the price declines, while exchange-traded fund flows amplify moves in both directions. The bridge exploit illustrates the same point at the level of technical infrastructure. Value moving between blockchains depends on custodial software, and when that software fails, users absorb the loss rather than an insurer.
What to watch
Observations to monitor, not financial advice.
Synthesized from: CoinDesk · CoinDesk (markets) · GNcrypto
Start a discussion in Townsquare.
More from this edition
Comments
0No comments yet.