Morning Edition · Friday, September 11, 2026Published at 1:17 AM EDT · New York
Commemorations in New York coincide with a Russian account, carried by state media, that Washington converted global sympathy in 2001 into its own strategic project.

The United States marks 25 years since the attacks that killed more than 3,000 people. The Financial Times wrote that the shock which briefly created a shared sense of purpose has left a complicated legacy. The Hindu described what now stands at the site, the Reflecting Absence memorial built as two pools on the footprints of the towers.
Moscow marked the anniversary differently. RIA Novosti reported that Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov described how the United States used the world's reaction to the attacks, the Russian government's standing argument that Washington converted an initial moment of near-universal sympathy, including from Russia, into a licence for interventions that followed.
The financial and institutional architecture built after 2001 is measurable even where the political consensus is not. Sanctions enforcement, correspondent banking surveillance, know-your-customer requirements and the extraterritorial reach of the dollar clearing system all expanded from counter-terrorism authorities. Those tools are now used mainly against states rather than against non-state groups, and their use is the single largest driver of the search for payment channels outside the dollar.
The anniversary arrives with American forces engaged against Iran, the Red Sea partly controlled by an armed movement, and leaders of the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and the countries that have joined since) assembling in New Delhi. The order that the attacks accelerated, in which one power set the terms of global security, is not the order in place today.
Part of a tracked trend
Middle Powers Build Security Blocs Outside Washington
States that once relied on American guarantees keep forming their own mutual defense arrangements, redirecting arms procurement away from Western suppliers and creating overlapping commitments that make regional crises harder to contain.
Moscow, which uses the anniversary to argue that American power has always been self-serving, and every government building payment channels outside dollar clearing, for which that argument is useful cover.
The commemoration and the post-2001 expansion of sanctions and financial-surveillance authority are well documented, but the Lavrov remarks rest on a single Russian state agency report that independent outlets have not carried, and the claim that counter-terrorism plumbing is now the main driver of de-dollarisation is an analytical judgement, not a measured finding, since reserve diversification also tracks interest rates, fiscal deficits and gold prices.
An open-source-intelligence read of how likely this story is true with its real nuance, not a judgment of any outlet. It assesses the claim, weighing independent and adversarial reporting. How we label confidence.
What this means
The financial surveillance and sanctions machinery built after 2001 gave the dollar system enforcement power, and the repeated use of that power against sovereign states is precisely what drives central banks to hold more gold and to build settlement channels that avoid American correspondent banks. The exposure runs both ways: the United States retains a tool no rival can match, and each use of it adds another counterparty with a reason to reduce dollar dependence. Gold's price over the past two years and the BRICS payments agenda are the two visible measures of that shift, and both will keep responding to how aggressively the enforcement tools are used.
Synthesized from: Financial Times · RIA Novosti · The Hindu
Start a discussion in Townsquare.
More from this edition
What to watch
Observations to monitor, not financial advice.
Comments
0No comments yet.