Ethiopia's Abiy vows to secure access to the Red Sea as a rebel offensive and a break with Eritrea raise the risk of a regional war

Ethiopia's government accuses Eritrea, Sudan and Egypt of backing the offensive launched on September 22, and Eritrea cut diplomatic ties with Ethiopia last week.

Ethiopia's Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed told parliament that government forces are ready to suppress a rebel offensive that has gone on for almost two weeks, Africanews reported. He also repeated his demand for a port on the Red Sea. Abiy said sea access was critical to Ethiopia's "civilisation," Al Jazeera reported. Ethiopia has had no coastline since Eritrea became independent in 1993. For months Abiy has pointed to the Eritrean port of Assab, which lies near the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

Ethiopia's state news agency, quoted by AllAfrica, reported Abiy saying that Ethiopia will assert its national interests "on its own terms" and act as "a decisive anchor state in the region." Eritrea accuses Ethiopia of seeking sea access through Eritrean territory. Eritrea cut diplomatic ties with Ethiopia last week, after Ethiopia accused Eritrea, Sudan and Egypt of supporting the offensive. The offensive began on September 22 and is attributed to a rebel alliance called the Coalition for Survival. Fighting is taking place in parts of Tigray, Afar and Amhara. It marks a major return to fighting since the 2022 agreement that ended the Tigray war.

AllAfrica's analysis says the war is changing alliances across the Horn of Africa. Eritrea fought on Ethiopia's side in the last Tigray war and is now on the opposing side. Egypt and Ethiopia also remain in dispute over Ethiopia's dam on the Nile.

Veracity: Plausible

74/100

If true, who benefits: If the framing holds, Addis Ababa gains a nationalist rally around its demand for a port and a reason to blame outside powers for the rebellion. Eritrea, Egypt and Sudan gain leverage over Ethiopia without fighting it directly.
The nuance: Africanews reports that Ethiopia expelled Eritrean diplomats first and that Eritrea then cut ties in response. It describes the rebel alliance as led by the Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF). Eritrea, Sudan and Egypt all deny backing the offensive, and Abiy has publicly ruled out war to gain sea access.

An open-source-intelligence read of how likely this story is true with its real nuance, not a judgment of any outlet. It assesses the claim, weighing independent and adversarial reporting. How we label confidence.

What this means

A war over access to the coast near Bab el-Mandeb would add a second conflict to the same waterway that the Saudi-led coalition is fighting to reopen in Yemen. Shipping insurers would treat the whole southern Red Sea as a combat zone, and the Suez Canal route that Egypt depends on would lose traffic. Ethiopia has many troops and little money. It defaulted on its Eurobond (a dollar-denominated bond sold to international investors) in December 2023, so a long war would delay any debt restructuring and weaken its currency further. Eritrea, Egypt and Sudan can raise the cost of an Ethiopian push to the coast without fighting Ethiopia directly. Gulf states with port investments on the Horn will need to decide which side to back. The likelier outcome over the next few months is a long fight in northern Ethiopia, with continued Ethiopian rhetoric about Assab but no direct cross-border assault. A move on the coast would require Ethiopian forces to first contain the rebels. The read is wrong if Ethiopian troops cross into Eritrea toward Assab, which would turn a civil conflict into an interstate war at the mouth of the Red Sea.

Townsquare

Start a discussion in Townsquare.

Comments

No comments yet.