Morning Edition · Thursday, October 15, 2026Published at 1:13 AM EDT · New York
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) named JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Citibank among them, and the consumer finance regulator has opened its own inquiry.
The OCC accused nine major US banks of denying services to customers and businesses because of their political views and activities, RT reported. The OCC published the report on Wednesday, stating that between 2020 and September 2025 all nine banks had such policies: JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citibank, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bank, Capital One, PNC Bank, TD Bank and BMO Bank.
The review was ordered under an executive order titled "Guaranteeing Fair Access to Banking for All Americans." The OCC said it reviewed about 420,000 pages of bank documents and found that some banks used broad "reputational risk" policies and industry restrictions without clear, objective criteria. The affected sectors included oil and gas, coal, firearms, private detention, tobacco and digital assets. Hours later, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) said it would investigate whether these banks and others complied with consumer-finance law. The banks have argued in past disputes over account closures that their decisions follow risk and compliance rules rather than politics. The reports cited here did not include the banks' responses to the new findings.
Crypto companies, one of the groups named in the report, are now obtaining their own banking licenses. Bitcoin Magazine reported that Payward, the parent company of the exchange Kraken, will buy Saldo Bank as part of a move into European banking. Owning a licensed bank means a crypto company no longer depends on another bank to keep its accounts open.
Part of a tracked trend
Banking Access Becomes a Political Instrument
Each US administration uses bank supervision to decide which industries and viewpoints get banking services, so access swings with elections and businesses respond by spreading accounts across jurisdictions or obtaining their own charters.
The administration, plus energy, firearms and crypto companies, gain grounds for more pressure on big banks, and crypto companies gain a reason to get their own bank charters. The nine banks face the cost of a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) investigation and pressure to drop reputational-risk policies.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) did publish a final report naming all nine banks, and the CFPB opened an inquiry. The report's wording is more cautious than "political views," however: it says the policies "may" restrict access, and most of the findings concern industry-wide limits, not individual political belief. The OCC imposed no fines or penalties. Its preliminary December 2025 findings covered 2020 to 2023, and some banks still say they did not debank customers.
An open-source-intelligence read of how likely this story is true with its real nuance, not a judgment of any outlet. It assesses the claim, weighing independent and adversarial reporting. How we label confidence.
Synthesized from: RT · Bitcoin Magazine
Start a discussion in Townsquare.
More from this edition
What this means
Access to the banking system is becoming an area where the party in power sets the rules. Regulators under the previous administration pushed banks to manage "reputational risk," and this administration is now penalizing that practice. The large banks face investigation costs, possible enforcement actions, and more scrutiny of how they assess clients. Energy, firearms and crypto businesses gain leverage whenever an account is closed. A US rule that changes with each election tells internationally mobile companies that political risk in banking now applies to US accounts too. Spreading accounts across jurisdictions, or owning a licensed bank as Payward is doing, reduces dependence on any single regulator. Our forward read: expect consent orders or formal guidance limiting "reputational risk" as grounds for closing accounts within months, and more crypto and energy companies applying for bank charters. If control of Congress changes in the midterms, expect hearings that reverse the direction. A court ruling limiting the executive order's reach over bank lending decisions would prove this wrong.
What to watch
Observations to monitor, not financial advice.
Comments
0No comments yet.