Morning Edition · Saturday, July 25, 2026Published at 1:44 AM EDT · New York

CLARITY Act Loses Momentum as Thune Doubts a Pre-Recess Vote and Fidelity Presses the Senate

Republicans added new provisions barring presidential crypto profits, Democrats rejected the ethics text within hours, and Goldman Sachs diverged from other large banks over the bill's reach.

Save

CLARITY Act Loses Momentum as Thune Doubts a Pre-Recess Vote and Fidelity Presses the Senate

The United States market-structure bill known as the CLARITY Act, which would divide oversight of digital assets between regulators and define when a token is a security, is stalling in the Senate. Majority Leader John Thune cast doubt on passing it before the August recess, telling reporters he did not think it would get done in time.

The sticking point is ethics. Republicans released a July 22 draft containing provisions that would bar the president and other federal officials from profiting from crypto ventures, aimed at President Donald Trump's dealings. Senate Democrats rejected the text within hours as too weak, while the White House argued they should accept the limits they had already won. The dispute has produced unusual alignments. CryptoSlate reports that Goldman Sachs diverged from other large banks over the bill, while Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson found himself aligned with Senator Elizabeth Warren, a longtime industry critic.

Industry pressure is intensifying regardless. Fidelity, the roughly $7 trillion asset manager, urged the Senate to pass the bill, joining crypto advocacy groups and even a police union in public endorsements.

Veracity: Corroborated

90/100

If true, who benefits: Delay preserves the current case-by-case enforcement regime that favors incumbents and lets Democrats keep leverage over provisions touching President Trump's crypto ventures, while passage would benefit US-domiciled exchanges and token issuers seeking defined boundaries.
The nuance: Thune doubted a full pre-recess vote but also said he wanted to "get Clarity started," so the story's "stalled" framing understates that a floor process could still begin, and the obstacle is as much recess-calendar mechanics as the ethics dispute.

An open-source-intelligence read of how likely this story is true with its real nuance, not a judgment of any outlet. It assesses the claim, weighing independent and adversarial reporting. How we label confidence.

What this means

The channel is legal certainty. Until Congress defines which regulator governs which token, exchanges and issuers price in enforcement risk, and institutions that need clear custody and disclosure rules limit their participation. A bill that fails to pass before the recess pushes that clarity into the autumn and keeps the current case-by-case enforcement regime in place. The parties exposed are US-domiciled exchanges and token issuers, who gain defined boundaries if it passes and continued ambiguity if it does not.

What to watch

Whether any vote is scheduled in the July 27 to August 7 window, the last realistic slot before the extended recess.
Whether Democrats and Republicans converge on ethics language, since that single provision is now the obstacle blocking the whole bill.
Whether more Wall Street firms follow Goldman in diverging from the other banks, which would reshape who the bill actually favors.

Observations to monitor, not financial advice.

3 sources

Synthesized from: CryptoSlate · Bitcoin Magazine · CoinDesk

Part of a tracked trend

Regulatory Perimeter for Crypto Hardens in EU and US

Over 3-6 months, enforcement deadlines and rulemaking debates narrow who can operate, with MiCA culling unlicensed EU firms and US regulators weighing durable rules over fragile exemptions.