Morning Edition · Tuesday, November 10, 2026Published at 12:42 AM EST · New York
On the same day, BlackRock said demand to swap directly held bitcoin for shares of its iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) is the highest it has seen, and that security is the main reason.

Rodolfo Novak, the chief executive of Coldcard maker Coinkite who posts as NVK, defended the company's security reviews on X on November 9. He argued that a new artificial intelligence (AI) model found a defect that human reviewers had missed. crypto.news puts losses from the Coldcard seed-generation exploit at $116 million. Other trackers count the theft in bitcoin, and an editor's note cited by Bitcoin.com News puts it above 2,000 BTC.
The root cause was a flaw in the randomness used to generate keys (entropy), introduced at build time. Analyses compiled by Rekt News and Forklog describe a configuration setting that was present but assigned a value of zero. The firmware still compiled, but seed generation fell back to a weaker software random-number generator, with no warning to the user. Seeds produced that way could be reconstructed. The attacker began draining hundreds of addresses on July 30. Accounts of the affected firmware versions differ, but reports center on Mk2 and Mk3 devices. Hours before the advisory, NVK said there was "no evidence of a flaw." He apologized on July 31 and accepted responsibility for the firmware failure. Users whose Coldcard key was only one signer in a multisignature setup kept their funds.
The second development involves institutional custody rather than self-custody. Robbie Mitchnick, who leads digital assets at BlackRock, told Barron's that demand to exchange directly held bitcoin for IBIT shares is at its highest yet. He said "security and peace of mind" is the top reason, as kidnappings and hacks increase. BlackRock sells the product that benefits from that shift, so its account is not neutral. It is still consistent with the timing of the Coldcard losses and the rise in physical attacks on holders.
NVK's claim implies a further risk. If AI models can find flaws that human reviewers miss, they will keep finding them in firmware already installed on customers' devices. A software patch cannot repair a seed that was generated with weak entropy. The only fix is to generate a new seed and move the funds to it.
Part of a tracked trend
Hardware-Wallet Trust Erodes
Recurring firmware and entropy defects in self-custody hardware, now surfaced faster by AI-assisted code analysis, will keep pushing risk-averse holders toward custodial and ETF products rather than personal key management.
Start a discussion in Townsquare.
More from this edition
Coinkite benefits if the failure reads as a new capability of artificial intelligence (AI) that no human reviewer could have matched, because that reading spreads the blame beyond its own review process. BlackRock benefits if the story moves large holders from self-custody into its iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) through in-kind conversions.
Coinkite's own account is that it has to assume an attacker used AI to find the bug, and the AI review it ran on its own code weeks earlier did not catch the flaw. That makes AI discovery a company inference, not a demonstrated fact. Critics call the AI framing self-serving. Loss estimates range from about $38 million to $70 million to more than $100 million. The claim that security is driving conversions into IBIT comes from BlackRock, the seller of the product, and I found it only in secondary reports such as Cryptoast.
An open-source-intelligence read of how likely this story is true with its real nuance, not a judgment of any outlet. It assesses the claim, weighing independent and adversarial reporting. How we label confidence.
What this means
Self-custody risk is shifting from user error to supplier error, and users cannot audit the supplier. When a hardware wallet's randomness fails, every key it produced is exposed at once, and the only remedy is a full migration. Holders who cannot run that process, or who fear physical coercion, are moving to exchange-traded funds (ETFs). That concentrates bitcoin with a small number of institutional custodians and turns a bearer asset into a claim on a regulated intermediary. The consensus treats this as a convenience trade. The less discussed cost is that ETF shares cannot be moved outside the regulated system, so these holders give up the property of bitcoin that matters most if capital controls tighten. A precedent is the 2020 Ledger customer-database leak, which led to years of phishing and physical threats and to a lasting rise in demand for multisignature setups. The likelier outcome over the next several months is a further increase in in-kind swaps into ETFs by large holders, while technically capable holders move to multisignature setups that combine devices from different vendors. This depends on continued reports of thefts and kidnappings. It would be proved wrong if ETFs began to see sustained in-kind redemptions back into self-custody.
What to watch
Observations to monitor, not financial advice.
Synthesized from: crypto.news · Bitcoin Magazine · Rekt News (Cold Card) · Bitcoin.com News · Forklog
Comments
0No comments yet.