Morning Edition · Tuesday, November 10, 2026Published at 12:42 AM EST · New York
The route moved about 117,000 NEAR, worth roughly $430,000, and Binance founder Changpeng Zhao acknowledged that staff skipped basic security rules before the $6.3 billion theft.

The people laundering the proceeds of the Binance theft have started issuing their own tokens. According to Elliptic, launderers it links to North Korea created six memecoins on the NEAR blockchain between November 5 and 7. They then moved about 117,000 NEAR, worth roughly $430,000, through liquidity pools they had built themselves. A launderer who controls both sides of a pool can run stolen coins through a swap instead of a direct transfer, which makes the trail harder for automated screening to follow. French-language channels picked up the finding the same day.
The amount is small relative to the size of the theft. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has attributed the theft, which took place on or about October 29, to the North Korean group it calls TraderTraitor. The FBI blames the same group for the $1.5 billion Bybit theft in 2025. North Korea denies involvement, and President Donald Trump told reporters, "We don't know if it's North Korea." TRM Labs estimated that $6.36 billion left Binance wallets, most of it in about 20 minutes. Chainalysis estimated that about $2.8 billion had been frozen, and Binance said it set aside more than $6.34 billion of company funds to cover customer losses.
The intrusion relied on social engineering against a single employee. Binance said the attack came through that employee's laptop. The Khaleej Times reports that attackers compromised the machine through a fake job interview. One report adds that the attackers then used an internal Binance artificial intelligence (AI) tool to reach other employees' computers, including an engineer's machine. No second source confirms that detail. Speaking at the Oxford Union, Zhao acknowledged that Binance employees had not followed basic security rules and said the attack could have been prevented. Rekt News has added the incident to its public list of crypto losses.
Each party gains from a particular reading of the facts. Attributing the theft to a state actor casts Binance as the victim of a nation-state attack. Zhao's admission instead places the failure inside the company's own operations. Elliptic sells tracing services and gains from showing that it can follow novel laundering routes. The on-chain facts support all three readings.
Part of a tracked trend
States Turn Crypto Rails Into Sanctions Instruments
Governments increasingly track, freeze, and seize on-chain assets to enforce sanctions, turning traceable ledgers and centrally controlled stablecoins into extensions of financial statecraft rather than escapes from it.
Start a discussion in Townsquare.
More from this edition
If the North Korea attribution holds, Binance can present a $6.3 billion loss as a nation-state attack and not an internal control failure. Washington gains a basis to press smaller chains and decentralized exchanges to screen addresses. Elliptic gains a public case study of a laundering route it can trace.
Elliptic's own report supports the memecoin mechanism, because the buying wallets were funded with stolen NEAR. The tie to North Korea, however, rests on the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) attribution to TraderTraitor, and no public forensic evidence accompanies it. Kim Yo Jong, the sister of North Korea's leader, called the claim "absurd rhetoric" in a statement carried by the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), and President Donald Trump said investigators did not know who did it. The $430,000 is also small next to the roughly 11.8 million stolen NEAR, worth about $43.7 million, that Elliptic says had not moved. Binance's own preliminary finding points to a compromised DevOps engineer's laptop, and reports of what Changpeng Zhao said at the Oxford Union come mainly from crypto-industry outlets.
An open-source-intelligence read of how likely this story is true with its real nuance, not a judgment of any outlet. It assesses the claim, weighing independent and adversarial reporting. How we label confidence.
What this means
The mechanism is a split in recoverability. Stablecoins have an issuer that can freeze them, and that is how most of the roughly $2.8 billion was locked. Native assets such as bitcoin, ether and NEAR have no issuer. They can only be stopped at venues that choose to screen, so the remaining proceeds will move toward permissionless pools and smaller chains whose front ends and validators have little compliance capacity. The Bybit theft of February 2025 is the precedent. The same group converted most of the ether to bitcoin within about two weeks, largely through the cross-chain swap protocol THORChain, whose node operators declined to block the flows. The likelier outcome is that the frozen share stops growing. The unfrozen remainder will move in small tranches over months through self-issued tokens and cross-chain swaps. Within weeks, US authorities will likely press the operators of smaller chains and decentralized exchanges to screen addresses the FBI has flagged. Binance customers face little direct loss, because Binance is covering it from its own capital. The lasting exposure is to exchanges' operational security and to the governance of chains that become laundering routes. This read is wrong if the large unfrozen holdings move in bulk to a centralized venue that freezes them, or if law enforcement announces a large seizure of native assets.
What to watch
Observations to monitor, not financial advice.
Synthesized from: CoinDesk · Bitcoin Magazine · Polylog editors · Rekt News · Al Jazeera · MLex · Khaleej Times · Nextgov
Comments
1Nov 10, 5:42 AM · edited
The $430,000 moved is under 0.01% of the $6.3 billion taken, so the NEAR memecoin route looks like a small trial of the method rather than a main laundering channel so far.