Morning Edition · Wednesday, July 8, 2026BREAKINGUpdated
Iran Strikes US Bases in Bahrain and Kuwait as Trump Declares Truce "Over"; Brent Tops $78
Iran's Revolutionary Guard fired ballistic missiles and drones at US installations in two more Gulf states, and President Trump, at a summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), declared the June 17 understanding that had paused the war finished and threatened strikes on Iranian energy infrastructure. Brent crude rose above $78 a barrel.

Updated at 4:03 PM
Iran struck US bases in Bahrain and Kuwait, and Trump declared the ceasefire "over" at the NATO summit and threatened further strikes.
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) launched ballistic missiles and drones at United States military sites in Bahrain and Kuwait, drawing two more Gulf states directly into the fighting. Kuwait said its air defenses intercepted two ballistic missiles and 13 drones with no casualties, and Bahrain reported a damaged residential building near its international airport and no deaths. The IRGC claimed it had hit 85 US military installations, including the headquarters of the US Navy's Fifth Fleet in Bahrain and Ali al-Salem Air Base in Kuwait, a figure US and Gulf officials dispute.
The strikes followed a fresh wave of US strikes on Iran overnight. Speaking at a NATO summit in Ankara, President Trump said the truce is "over", called Iran's leaders "scum," and warned of further attacks, telling reporters, "We're going to hit them hard tonight." The exchange follows attacks on three commercial vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz on Tuesday and the earlier US strikes on more than 80 targets inside Iran.
Oil prices climbed further. Brent crude rose about 5% to around $78 a barrel, reversing an earlier decline toward pre-war levels, after settling higher earlier in the session. The United States Treasury withdrew the waiver that had allowed Iran to sell its oil, and Trump suggested Washington could again blockade Iranian ports and seize Kharg Island, the terminal that handles most of Iran's crude exports.
The accounts of damage diverge. Russian state media, citing American reporting, said Iran's missiles were intercepted and caused no US casualties. Iranian officials described the exchange as a defense of national sovereignty. China, Iran's largest oil customer, said it supports a return to normal conditions in the Strait of Hormuz and urged respect for Iran's rights as a coastal state.
Beyond oil, markets reacted more calmly. Analysts in Tel Aviv noted that equity indexes were moderating their declines even as crude jumped, which suggests traders are treating the renewed fighting as a supply-risk event rather than a wider war.
Part of a tracked trend
Mideast De-escalation Pulls Oil to Multi-Month Lows
Over the next 3-9 months easing Middle East supply risk—a US-Iran truce, reopened Hormuz shipping talks, and returning Venezuelan and other barrels—pushes crude lower and eases global energy inflation.
- If true, who benefits
Oil exporters and hard-asset holders gain a fresh risk premium, and Washington's narrative that Iran broke the truce justifies the withdrawal of the oil waiver.
- The nuance
Independent reporting confirms the strikes and the ship attacks, but who attacked the three vessels and who fired first are attributed claims, and the casualty and damage counts diverge sharply between American, Iranian, and Russian sources.
An open-source-intelligence read of how likely this story is true with its real nuance, not a judgment of any outlet. It assesses the claim, weighing independent and adversarial reporting. How we label confidence.
What this means
Crude is the transmission channel. The IMF's own forecast, published hours before the strikes, assumed Hormuz would reopen in mid-July, so a renewed closure directly threatens that assumption and feeds into the 4.7% inflation path the fund now projects. Energy importers, airlines, and rate-sensitive equities lose through higher fuel costs and firmer yields, while oil exporters and holders of hard assets gain. Because roughly a fifth of seaborne crude moves through the strait, even a partial disruption reprices global energy inflation and complicates the task of every central bank still trying to cut rates.
What to watch
- Whether the US carries out the further strikes Trump threatened on Iranian energy infrastructure, particularly Kharg Island. Hitting that terminal would remove most of Iran's crude exports from the market and could push oil prices sharply higher.
- Whether more Gulf states that host US forces are drawn into the fighting after the strikes on Bahrain and Kuwait. A widening set of combatants would raise the risk to shipping and energy facilities across the region.
- Whether traffic through the Strait of Hormuz slows as shipowners avoid the waterway. Fewer transits would tighten global oil and liquefied natural gas supply even without a formal closure.
- China's response as Iran's largest oil buyer. Any move by Beijing beyond calling for de-escalation would signal how far major importers will go to protect their energy supply.
Observations to monitor, not financial advice.
Synthesized from: The New York Times · Euronews · Kommersant · Globes
More from this edition
- IMF Cuts 2026 Global Growth to 3% and Lifts Inflation Forecast to 4.7%
- Wall Street Opens Lower as Chip Stocks Fall and Bond Yields Climb
- Tanzania Adds Nearly 28 Tons of Gold to Reserves as Bullion Trades Near $4,100
- Trump Criticizes Allies at NATO Summit and Repeats Demand for Greenland
- US Will License Ukraine to Produce Patriot Interceptors, Trump Says
- Millions Mourn Iran's Slain Supreme Leader as Coffin Moves Through Iraq
- Xi Tells Scientists to Make China a Leading Science Power by 2035
- Canadian Police Say No Evidence Links Indian Government to Nijjar Killing
- EU Plans to Revise Crypto Rules in 2027 as Trump Pushes Stablecoins
- Fuel and Power Shortages in Crimea Signal Strain in Russia's War Economy
- Tensions Rise in DR Congo Over Referendum Critics Call a Third-Term Bid