Morning Edition · Tuesday, September 8, 2026Published at 1:13 AM EDT · New York
Foreign issuers are raising Chinese currency at low onshore rates, extending the renminbi's role from a settlement currency to a funding currency.

The Financial Times reports that issuance of dim sum and panda bonds has passed $149 billion so far this year, which it describes as a record for offshore borrowing in renminbi. Dim sum bonds are renminbi bonds sold outside mainland China, mostly in Hong Kong. Panda bonds are renminbi bonds sold inside China by foreign issuers. Both markets are drawing borrowers for the same reason: Chinese funding costs are low relative to dollar and euro funding costs, and the gap has persisted long enough for treasurers to build it into their plans.
Two other developments this week fit the same pattern. A Kazakh government adviser told the South China Morning Post that Hong Kong's capital markets could finance Central Asian manufacturing and serve as a base for advanced production aimed at Europe. Separately, Kommersant, citing Chinese customs data, reported that trade between Russia and China rose 28.4 percent in the first eight months of the year to $185.05 billion, a flow that is now settled overwhelmingly outside the dollar.
None of this displaces the dollar as the world's reserve asset. Chinese capital controls remain, and foreign holders of renminbi cannot move it as freely as dollars. What is changing is narrower and more concrete. When a European bank or a Middle Eastern sovereign borrower can fund more cheaply in renminbi than in dollars, it does, and each such transaction builds a market with real depth, real pricing and real intermediaries. Reserve currency status historically follows funding and invoicing habits rather than preceding them.
Part of a tracked trend
The Renminbi Becomes a Funding Currency
Cheap Chinese funding costs keep pulling non-Chinese borrowers into renminbi debt markets, so the currency's international role expands through borrowing and invoicing habits rather than through reserve reallocation, and the process continues as long as the rate gap persists.
Hong Kong intermediaries and Chinese policy banks gain fee income and market depth, Beijing gains evidence for its currency-internationalization case, and non-Chinese treasurers gain a cheaper funding option that reduces their exposure to Federal Reserve policy.
The direction is corroborated but the scope of the $149 billion figure is not, since independent tallies count different things and report smaller numbers, including a record 218 billion yuan raised by overseas issuers and about 300 billion yuan of total dim sum issuance by April, so whether the total covers all issuers or only foreign ones changes what the record means.
An open-source-intelligence read of how likely this story is true with its real nuance, not a judgment of any outlet. It assesses the claim, weighing independent and adversarial reporting. How we label confidence.
What this means
A borrower who funds in renminbi acquires renminbi liabilities that must be serviced in renminbi, which creates ongoing demand for the currency that does not depend on Chinese policy or on any political decision to dedollarize. That is a slower and more durable channel than reserve reallocation. Dollar funding markets lose marginal issuance volume, Hong Kong intermediaries gain fee income, and borrowers in Central Asia, the Gulf and Latin America gain a second funding option that reduces their exposure to Federal Reserve policy.
Synthesized from: Financial Times · South China Morning Post · Kommersant
Start a discussion in Townsquare.
More from this edition
What to watch
Observations to monitor, not financial advice.
Comments
1Sep 8, 5:13 AM · edited
Foreign issuers holding renminbi liabilities have a natural incentive to generate renminbi revenues by selling into China, which deepens two way trade flows independently of exchange rate policy.