Morning Edition · Saturday, September 12, 2026UpdatedPublished at 7:41 AM EDT · New York
The group says passage is safe for every flag except Saudi vessels, a claim that places commercial decisions about the Suez route in the hands of one armed movement.

Updated at 7:41 AM EDT
Saudi Arabia's crown prince called President Trump twice asking for direct US strikes on Houthi forces after the fall of Mokha and Perim; Trump rejected the request, offering intelligence and targeting support instead while keeping US forces focused on Iran and the Strait of Hormuz.
Yemeni government officials said Houthi fighters reached Perim Island, which splits the Bab al-Mandab into two shipping lanes, after government forces withdrew, and that the advance completed the group's control of the Yemeni side of the strait. The same officials said a week-long offensive, which also took the Red Sea port of Mokha, left hundreds dead. A Houthi military spokesman said the push was intended to expel Saudi-backed forces from the remaining western coastline and that navigation through the strait is safe for all vessels except Saudi ones.
BBC Hindi framed the outcome in blunt terms, reporting that seven months after the joint United States and Israeli attack on Iran began, Tehran and its allies now hold positions commanding two of the world's most important maritime routes, the Strait of Hormuz and the southern entrance to the Red Sea. European reporting described the capture of Perim as taking control of the strait rather than merely threatening it.
Saudi Arabia asked Washington to intervene directly as the offensive unfolded. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman called President Trump twice on Thursday urging strikes on Houthi forces as they advanced, according to Axios and CBS News. Trump rejected both requests. A US official said Washington would share intelligence and targeting information with Riyadh but would not commit American forces, because the administration wants to keep its military focus on Iran and the Strait of Hormuz rather than open a second front in Yemen. The request itself marked a reversal for Saudi Arabia, which had told Washington as recently as July that it could handle the Houthis on its own.
Bab al-Mandab carries less crude than Hormuz, but it is the gate to the Suez Canal and therefore to container traffic between Asia and Europe. Shipowners who had already been routing around the Cape of Good Hope during earlier Red Sea attacks now face a situation where transit depends on a political judgment about cargo, owner and flag rather than on naval escort. Egypt, which collects Suez tolls, and shippers paying for the longer route around Africa bear the cost.
Part of a tracked trend
Iran War Spills Across Fronts
The US-Iran conflict keeps drawing in new theaters and third parties, from the Red Sea to the Caspian, so its risk premium spreads to infrastructure and shipping lanes previously thought insulated from the Gulf.
The Houthi movement and Iran, which gain a second maritime lever, plus container lines and insurers that price the longer Cape route, while Egypt loses Suez transit revenue.
The account of Perim's fall comes from Yemeni government officials and is reported by European outlets as control of the strait, yet holding a 13 square kilometre island is not the same as controlling a 30 kilometre waterway whose opposite shore is Djibouti, and the Houthi assurance of safe passage for all but Saudi vessels is a statement of intent that past targeting has not matched.
An open-source-intelligence read of how likely this story is true with its real nuance, not a judgment of any outlet. It assesses the claim, weighing independent and adversarial reporting. How we label confidence.
What this means
Control of Perim converts the Bab al-Mandab from a contested lane into a managed one, where an armed movement decides which flags pass. Container lines and their customers pay through longer voyages and higher war-risk insurance, Egypt loses Suez Canal revenue it uses to service foreign-currency debt, and European importers face delivery times measured in extra weeks. The same capability also gives Iran's allies a second lever over global trade at a moment when negotiations over the Gulf are live.
Synthesized from: The Hindu · BBC News Hindi
Start a discussion in Townsquare.
More from this edition
What to watch
Observations to monitor, not financial advice.
Comments
1Sep 12, 5:16 AM · edited
The BBC report that Iran's alliance now controls both Hormuz and the Bab al Mandab means the two choke points act together rather than as alternatives, so rerouting to avoid one does not escape the other.