Morning Edition · Sunday, September 27, 2026Published at 1:23 AM EDT · New York
The average price of a one-carat natural diamond has dropped to about $3,900 from more than $8,000 in 2021, and the company's chief executive is pursuing a strategy that depends on consumers returning to mined gems.

The index that tracks investment-quality diamond prices fell in August to the lowest level it has recorded, according to the Israeli business daily Globes, which reported that the average price of a one-carat natural diamond has fallen to roughly $3,900 from more than $8,000 in 2021. Laboratory-grown stones, which are chemically identical and now cost a fraction of mined equivalents, are the main cause.
De Beers is responding with a marketing argument rather than a supply one. Its chief executive told the Financial Times that a cultural shift back toward natural products can restore the category, positioning mined diamonds against synthetics on provenance and rarity rather than on appearance. The company is effectively asking buyers to pay for provenance and brand narrative that a machine cannot replicate, because the physical distinction no longer supports the price.
The contrast with gold is instructive. Gold cannot be manufactured at scale, and its price sits about 23 percent below the level it reached in January, a decline driven by a monetary shock rather than a technological one. Diamonds were marketed for decades as a store of value on the strength of controlled supply. Once laboratory production removed the supply constraint, the resale market repriced the underlying asset toward its production cost.
For producing countries, the consequence is fiscal. Botswana, Namibia and Angola depend on diamond royalties that were set when the scarcity premium held.
What this means
The mechanism is the collapse of an engineered scarcity rent. Diamonds commanded a premium because supply was controlled and buyers believed the stones would hold value, and laboratory production removed the first condition, which then destroyed the second. The exposed parties are Anglo American, which has sought to separate from De Beers, the Antwerp, Surat and Ramat Gan trading and polishing centres, and the treasuries of southern African producer states where diamond revenue funds a large share of the budget. The lesson generalises to any asset whose value rests on a supply constraint that technology or policy can remove, and it is the reason monetary metals with no synthetic substitute behave differently in the same period. De Beers can fund advertising and certification, but it cannot restore the cost gap. The likelier outcome over the coming years is continued price convergence toward production cost for mined stones outside the very top of the quality range, with pressure on producer-state budgets, unless certification of origin succeeds in creating a durable two-tier market. A sustained recovery in one-carat resale prices would be the evidence that the natural-provenance strategy is working.
What to watch
Observations to monitor, not financial advice.
Synthesized from: Globes · Financial Times
Start a discussion in Townsquare.
More from this edition
Comments
0No comments yet.