Morning Edition · Tuesday, September 29, 2026Published at 1:07 AM EDT · New York
Khartoum denies the Ethiopian allegation, and its foreign minister addressed the General Assembly after Washington refused a visa to General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan.

The Ethiopian government has accused Sudan and Eritrea of supporting armed groups fighting federal forces in northern Ethiopia, claims Khartoum rejects, RFI reported, as renewed clashes raised fears of a return to full-scale war in Tigray. The accusation draws two neighboring states into a conflict that officially ended with a 2022 agreement between the Ethiopian government and Tigrayan authorities, an agreement both sides now describe as under strain.
At the United Nations, Sudan's foreign minister told the General Assembly that no solution to his country's war can be imposed from outside, UN News reported. He spoke in place of General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, the de facto head of state, whose visa application Washington rejected.
Taken together, the two statements describe a Horn of Africa in which three states accuse one another of proxy involvement while the principal external mediator has limited access to one of the parties. The region borders the southern approach to the Red Sea, the route that carries a large share of Europe-Asia container traffic and Gulf energy exports.
Addis Ababa gains an external explanation for a domestic insurgency and a case for military spending, Tigrayan authorities gain from any narrative that internationalizes the conflict, and Gulf investors in Red Sea ports plus carriers already rerouting around Hormuz bear the risk of a second disrupted chokepoint.
The accusation came from Ethiopia's army chief Field Marshal Birhanu Jula, who named Egypt alongside Sudan and Eritrea and offered no public evidence, Sudan's military called the claim baseless, and the article omits both the Egypt accusation and the reported condition attached to Burhan's visa, which US officials tied to his acceptance of a 90-day ceasefire plan he rejected.
An open-source-intelligence read of how likely this story is true with its real nuance, not a judgment of any outlet. It assesses the claim, weighing independent and adversarial reporting. How we label confidence.
What this means
The exposure falls on shipping and on the Gulf states that have invested in Red Sea ports and in Ethiopian and Sudanese agriculture. A widening confrontation among Ethiopia, Eritrea and Sudan would add pressure on the Bab al-Mandab strait at the same time the Strait of Hormuz remains disrupted, forcing carriers to route around two chokepoints instead of one and raising freight rates on Europe-Asia trade. The precedent is the 2020-2022 Tigray war, during which Ethiopia's access to external financing narrowed sharply and its currency and debt restructuring talks stalled. The likelier outcome over the coming months is escalating accusations and localized fighting rather than a declared war between states, because none of the three governments can finance a sustained military campaign, and because Gulf backers hold investments on multiple sides of the dispute. Direct cross-border military operations by Eritrean or Sudanese forces would change that assessment.
Synthesized from: AllAfrica / RFI · AllAfrica / UN News
Start a discussion in Townsquare.
More from this edition
What to watch
Observations to monitor, not financial advice.
Comments
0No comments yet.