Morning Edition · Friday, October 9, 2026Published at 1:18 AM EDT · New York
The US blockade at the Strait of Hormuz stays in force, and Vitol's chief executive says ship-to-ship transfers in the Gulf of Oman are the main reason prices are not far higher.

Brent crude futures settled $4.08, or 4.1%, higher at $104.28 a barrel on Thursday. US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) gained $3.21, or 3.6%, to $91.49. The Nation Thailand attributed the move to the Middle East war and to concern about hurricanes. In early Asian trading on Friday, Brent fell about 1% to $103 and WTI fell 0.75% to $90.5, after President Donald Trump said the United States would not attack Iran before the November 3 midterm elections.
Trump's statement removed one path to escalation for the next four weeks. It did not change the physical supply picture. Trump said the US blockade at the Strait of Hormuz would remain in "full force", and Iran has not yet answered Washington's counterproposal on reopening the waterway.
Russell Hardy, chief executive of Vitol, the world's largest independent oil trader, told OilPrice that ship-to-ship transfers in the Gulf of Oman are keeping Gulf crude moving, and that without them the market would face a far larger shortfall. He did not rule out $200 oil. At a London industry forum on October 6, Hardy called $200 a conditional scenario, not a forecast. He said Middle East exports had recovered to about 14 million barrels a day, but that the relay of tankers needed for the workaround had caused a vessel shortage and a steep rise in freight costs.
Refined products are tighter still. Chinese refiners suspended October fuel exports to protect domestic stocks. Four trade sources now say Beijing will let October exports resume after a brief halt. Since March, China has issued its gasoline, diesel and jet fuel export permits one month at a time, so buyers in Asia cannot plan beyond the current month.
For central banks, the price of oil is a real cost that monetary policy cannot change. The Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank and the Reserve Bank of India are each tightening in response to energy-driven inflation. That tightening raises borrowing costs for the rest of the economy without adding a single barrel of supply.
Part of a tracked trend
Middle East War Premium Returns to Oil
Renewed US-Iran conflict reinstates a geopolitical risk premium in crude that reverses the earlier de-escalation slide, feeding energy-driven inflation and redistributing income toward oil producers each time brinkmanship flares.
If Hormuz throughput rather than strike risk sets the price, the gains go to tanker owners, to producers outside the Gulf and to traders such as Vitol that run the ship-to-ship relay, while fuel importers with weak currencies and airlines pay the higher freight and insurance costs.
Trump's Truth Social post ruled out a strike only until the vote and said the war would end "immediately" afterward. Russell Hardy, Vitol's chief executive, called $200 a conditional scenario that depends on Hormuz flows failing. So the pledge moves escalation risk to after November 3 rather than removing it, and the $200 figure is a worst case named by a trading house that earns more when prices swing.
An open-source-intelligence read of how likely this story is true with its real nuance, not a judgment of any outlet. It assesses the claim, weighing independent and adversarial reporting. How we label confidence.
What this means
Synthesized from: Economic Times · OilPrice · The Nation Thailand · Investing.com Commodities
Start a discussion in Townsquare.
More from this edition
Trump's pledge removes the risk of a US strike until November 3, but the blockade and the tanker relay still set the supply. Over the next month, the risk premium is likelier to come from freight rates, vessel availability and refinery export permits than from new strike threats. Fuel importers with weak currencies, such as India, are most exposed, along with airlines and refiners that depend on Gulf crude. Producers outside the Gulf and tanker owners gain. Markets may be reading the midterm pledge as de-escalation, but it leaves the blockade unchanged. In the 1980s Tanker War, Gulf exports continued under escort, and shipping and insurance costs absorbed most of the risk. The current workaround follows the same pattern. The desk's read is that Brent will stay near current levels rather than fall back toward pre-war prices over the coming weeks, because Hormuz throughput, not the threat of a strike, now sets the price. A signed version of Iran's seven-day plan that reopens the strait would prove this read wrong.
What to watch
Observations to monitor, not financial advice.
Comments
1Oct 9, 5:18 AM · edited
The Brent to WTI spread widened to $12.79 from $11.92 on Thursday, which places most of the new risk premium on seaborne crude exposed to Hormuz rather than on US inland supply.