Morning Edition · Friday, November 6, 2026Published at 4:38 AM EST · New York
Analysts at Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan say high prices have pushed the oil market back into surplus, and China's third-quarter carbon emissions fell 3.1% as industrial fuel use declined.

Brent crude rose $1.57, or 1.6%, to $99.86 a barrel early on Friday, and some quotes briefly passed $100. It was the second straight daily gain. Brent and West Texas Intermediate are still headed for weekly declines of about 12%. Investing.com attributes the rebound to new attacks on tankers.
The weekly loss came from politics. Oil fell 8% on Wednesday after Democrats won broad victories in the US midterm elections, as traders bet on a de-escalation of the US and Israeli war with Iran. The rebound came from the sea. Iranian authorities reported three more tanker attacks on Thursday, and Daniel Hynes, a strategist at ANZ, said flows through the Strait of Hormuz were under 60% of capacity.
Demand is falling as prices stay high. According to OilPrice, analysts at Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan estimate that the global market has returned to surplus because high prices have destroyed demand, and that fear of a glut is replacing fear of a deficit. China's numbers support that view. Citing Reuters and the Finland-based Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, OilPrice reports that China's carbon dioxide emissions fell 3.1% in the third quarter as industrial fuel use declined.
High prices are rationing oil faster than diplomacy is supplying it. Refiners and industry in the largest importing country have cut use, and that shrinks the premium that each new attack can add. The premium has not disappeared. With Hormuz flows at less than 60% of normal, a single attack still adds a few dollars a barrel within hours.
Part of a tracked trend
Middle East War Premium Returns to Oil
Renewed US-Iran conflict reinstates a geopolitical risk premium in crude that reverses the earlier de-escalation slide, feeding energy-driven inflation and redistributing income toward oil producers each time brinkmanship flares.
If attacks keep Hormuz flows below 60% of capacity, as ANZ's Daniel Hynes estimates, Gulf exporters with pipelines that bypass the strait and Tehran's position in talks with Washington both gain, while Asian importers with thin storage carry the price risk.
The edition says Iranian authorities "reported" the attacks, but the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said the tankers caught fire after entering routes it called unauthorised, which reads as Iran enforcing its own control of the strait, not as an attack by an unknown party.
An open-source-intelligence read of how likely this story is true with its real nuance, not a judgment of any outlet. It assesses the claim, weighing independent and adversarial reporting. How we label confidence.
What this means
Two forces set the price. Physical supply from the Gulf is restricted and lifts the price after each attack. Demand at around $100 is weak enough that analysts see a surplus, and it pulls the price down whenever diplomacy looks possible. Gulf exporters with pipelines that avoid Hormuz gain from both. Importers with little storage, such as large Asian buyers, carry the risk of a spike. The market already priced a US-Iran de-escalation after the election. The new risk is the reported US option to resume strikes on November 9, which the price does not yet reflect. The consensus "glut" view assumes Hormuz flows recover. If flows stay below 60%, the surplus Goldman and JPMorgan describe does not reach buyers who need Gulf crude grades. In 2019, after the attack on Abqaiq, the rise in Brent prices reversed within weeks because spare capacity covered the loss. Today, the Gulf region's spare production capacity lies behind the same strait that is under attack. The likelier outcome is a range of roughly $90 to $105 in the coming weeks, with price spikes on each attack and declines on each diplomatic signal. That holds unless the United States resumes strikes. Renewed strikes would push the price above that range within days. A verified reopening of Hormuz to normal traffic would push it below that range.
Synthesized from: Investing.com · OilPrice (glut) · OilPrice (China emissions) · Invezz
Start a discussion in Townsquare.
More from this edition
What to watch
Observations to monitor, not financial advice.
Comments
0No comments yet.